Angola Red x Skunk #1
Modern
SChybrid-sativa
Sugar Candy
14.6%
THC
Top flavors
earthycitrussweet
CalmingEnergizing
Sugar Candy effects are mostly calming.
Low THCHigh THC
Sugar Candy is lower THC than average.
Sugar Candy is a modern hybrid-sativa strain derived from its singular parent, Caramelo. Developed as a high-yielding cultivar, this strain reaches maturity after a 53-day flowering period. It is considered moderately difficult to cultivate and is suitable for both indoor and outdoor growing environments.
The aromatic profile of Sugar Candy is defined by a primary presence of terpinolene, which provides its distinct olfactory character. This is followed by a secondary influence of myrcene, with caryophyllene rounding out the tertiary levels of the terpene profile. These compounds work in concert to establish the specific sensory experience associated with the plant.
With a THC-dominant cannabinoid profile averaging approximately 14.6%, the effects of Sugar Candy are characterized by a sense of uplifted happiness and creative stimulation. Users often select this strain for activities that require focus, social engagement, or the promotion of creative pursuits. Currently, there are no notable offspring recorded for this variety.
Terpene Profile
Synergies (+) and conflicts (−) are relative to each other within this profile.
myrcene ~60%limonene ~28%ocimene ~12%
| Terpene | Share | Character | Likely role |
|---|---|---|---|
| myrcene | ~60% | earthy | relaxing · solo |
| limonene | ~28% | citrus | social · creative |
| ocimene | ~12% | sweet | energetic · social |
Research notes below describe isolated terpene mechanisms and early findings. They do not guarantee effects from this strain and are not medical advice.
Russo 2011: naloxone-sensitive analgesia, potentiates barbiturate sleep; dominant sedating terpenoid; blocks hepatic carcinogenesis by aflatoxin.
Russo 2011: increases serotonin in prefrontal cortex + dopamine in hippocampus via 5-HT1A; Johns Hopkins 2024: significantly reduced anxiety vs THC alone.
Antifungal, antiviral, decongestant; activates CB1/CB2 at 10–60% THC efficacy per Israeli receptor study (NORML 2025); highly volatile (bp 50–66°C); limited clinical data.
Effects
Reported effects — derived from terpene chemistry and cannabinoid profile.
◈
creative
morningAssociated with terpinolene/limonene profiles; dopaminergic and serotonergic modulation via limonene 5-HT1A supports divergent thinking.
△
uplifted
morningLimonene anxiolytic/antidepressant via serotonin elevation in prefrontal cortex (Russo 2011); mood improvement without full euphoria; key for balanced-1-1 profiles.
◉
happy
anytimeGenetic Profile
Sativa-dominant
■ Indica 30%■ Sativa 70%
Primarily sativa with indica grounding. Uplifting with body relaxation.
THC-Dominant
High THC, trace CBD. Psychoactive. Full CB1 agonism — euphoria, appetite, analgesia.
Genealogy
Parentage, ancestry, and genetic relatives of Sugar Candy.
Composite Traits
Where to buy Sugar Candy
No verified dispensaries on file — find it on Leafly.
Dispensary Locator
Find which dispensaries near you currently stock Sugar Candy.
or enter a city / postcode
Community Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first!
No reviews yet for Sugar Candy.
⊕
What would Sugar Candy × ? produce?
Predict the terpene profile, effects, and growing traits of a cross. Our gene weaver engine votes on dominant traits from both parents.
Build a cross with Sugar Candy →Similar strains
Same primary terpene with overlapping effects.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Sugar Candy indica or sativa?
Sugar Candy is modeled here as a sativa-dominant (primarily sativa with indica grounding).
What terpene is dominant in Sugar Candy?
Myrcene is shown as the dominant terpene at approximately ~60%. Limonene follows as the secondary terpene.
Is Sugar Candy good for daytime use?
Sugar Candy is versatile and works across different times of day depending on dose and individual response.
How accurate is this data?
See the "Data confidence" card in the sidebar. Terpene profiles and effects are chemistry-informed estimates — individual responses depend on phenotype, source, and personal chemistry.