Pudding
27.1%
THC
0.15%
CBD
Top flavors
Terpenes
Pudding has balanced effects.
Pudding potency is higher THC than average.
Pudding
27.1%
THC
0.15%
CBD
Top flavors
Terpenes
Pudding has balanced effects.
Pudding potency is higher THC than average.
Pudding is a modern hybrid-indica whose exact origins and developmental history remain undocumented. Breeders have not publicly confirmed its lineage, and while it is associated with the Star Killer strain, the broader genetic background of this variety remains unverified. Given the thin documentation surrounding its creation, there is no established history regarding its primary breeder or the timeframe of its emergence.
The chemical complexity of Pudding is defined by a terpene profile that features caryophyllene as the dominant compound, followed by limonene, myrcene, linalool, humulene, bisabolol, pinene, and terpinolene. This terpene profile tends to present a nuanced sensory experience, though its order may vary [ESTIMATED]. In terms of potency, the strain contains an estimated 27.1% THC and an estimated 0.15% CBD. These figures represent an averaged projection based on published data and should not be viewed as a static value for every batch.
Pudding functions as a modern hybrid-indica that supports users through effects of relaxation and focus. These properties make it a candidate for those seeking support with pain, stress, and sleep. The plant requires moderate cultivation skill, thriving in both indoor and outdoor environments with a flowering cycle of 74 days and a capacity for high yields. There are currently no notable offspring recorded for this strain.
Terpene Profile
Synergies (+) and conflicts (−) are relative to each other within this profile.
| Terpene | Share | Character | Likely role |
|---|---|---|---|
| caryophyllene | ~60% | spicy | relaxing · social |
| limonene | ~28% | citrus | social · creative |
| myrcene | ~12% | earthy | relaxing · solo |
Research notes below describe isolated terpene mechanisms and early findings. They do not guarantee effects from this strain and are not medical advice.
~60%
spicy
●●○○
Russo 2011: only terpene that is a selective full CB2 agonist (100 nM); Gertsch et al. 2008: acts as dietary cannabinoid; unique anti-inflammatory and gastric cytoprotective properties.
Russo 2011: increases serotonin in prefrontal cortex + dopamine in hippocampus via 5-HT1A; Johns Hopkins 2024: significantly reduced anxiety vs THC alone.
Russo 2011: naloxone-sensitive analgesia, potentiates barbiturate sleep; dominant sedating terpenoid; blocks hepatic carcinogenesis by aflatoxin.
Effects
Reported effects — derived from terpene chemistry and cannabinoid profile.
Genetic Profile
Indica-dominant
Primarily indica with sativa influence. Relaxing body with some cerebral lift.
THC-Dominant
High THC, trace CBD. Psychoactive. Full CB1 agonism — euphoria, appetite, analgesia.
Genealogy
Parentage, ancestry, and genetic relatives of Pudding.
Siblings
Share parent star killer
Offspring — 9 strains bred from Pudding
name-inferredComposite Traits
Where to buy Pudding
No verified dispensaries on file — find it on Leafly.
Dispensary Locator
Find which dispensaries near you currently stock Pudding.
or enter a city / postcode
Community Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first!
No reviews yet for Pudding.
What would Pudding × ? produce?
Predict the terpene profile, effects, and growing traits of a cross. Our gene weaver engine votes on dominant traits from both parents.
Build a cross with Pudding →Similar strains
Same primary terpene with overlapping effects.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Pudding indica or sativa?
Pudding is modeled here as a indica-dominant (primarily indica with sativa influence).
What terpene is dominant in Pudding?
Caryophyllene is shown as the dominant terpene at approximately ~60%. Limonene follows as the secondary terpene.
Is Pudding good for daytime use?
Pudding is versatile and works across different times of day depending on dose and individual response.
How accurate is this data?
See the "Data confidence" card in the sidebar. Terpene profiles and effects are chemistry-informed estimates — individual responses depend on phenotype, source, and personal chemistry.